Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiographics ; 42(2): 321-339, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35179983

RESUMO

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly offered to patients undergoing treatment of breast cancer and prophylaxis treatment for reduction of breast cancer risk. NSM is considered oncologically safe for appropriately selected patients and is associated with improved cosmetic outcomes and quality of life. Accepted indications for NSM have expanded in recent years, and currently only inflammatory breast cancer or malignancy involving the nipple is considered an absolute contraindication. Neoplasms close to and involving the nipple areolar complex are common, and cancer of the lactiferous ducts can spread to the nipple. Therefore, accurate determination of nipple involvement at imaging examinations is critical to identifying appropriate candidates for NSM and preventing local recurrence. Multiple imaging features have been described as predictors of nipple involvement, with tumor to nipple distance, enhancement between the index malignancy and the nipple, and nipple retraction demonstrating the highest predictive values. These features can be assessed at multimodality breast imaging, particularly at breast MRI, which demonstrates high specificity and negative predictive value for determining nipple involvement in malignancy. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mamoplastia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia/métodos , Mamilos/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamilos/patologia , Mamilos/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Radiologistas , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Cancer Med ; 10(15): 5051-5061, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34245128

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Long-term breast cancer survivors are at risk for cardiotoxicity after treatment, but there is insufficient evidence to provide long-term (~10 years) cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening recommendations. We sought to evaluate a tri-modality CVD screening approach. METHODS: This single-arm, feasibility study enrolled 201 breast cancer patients treated ≥6 years prior without CVD at diagnosis. Patients were sub-grouped: cardiotoxic (left-sided) radiation (RT), cardiotoxic (anthracycline-based) chemotherapy, both cardiotoxic chemotherapy and RT, and neither cardiotoxic treatment. Patients underwent electrocardiogram (EKG), transthoracic echocardiogram with strain (TTE with GLS), and coronary artery calcium computed tomography (CAC CT). The primary endpoint was preclinical or clinical CVD. RESULTS: Median age was 50 (29-65) at diagnosis and 63 (37-77) at imaging; median interval was 11.5 years (6.7-14.5). Among sub-groups, 44% had no cardiotoxic treatment, 31.5% had cardiotoxic RT, 16% had cardiotoxic chemotherapy, and 8.5% had both. Overall, 77.6% showed preclinical and/or clinical CVD and 51.5% showed clinical CVD. Per modality, rates of any CVD and clinical CVD were, respectively: 27.1%/10.0% on EKG, 50.0%/25.3% on TTE with GLS, and 50.8%/45.8% on CAC CT. No statistical difference was seen among the treatment subgroups (NS, χ2 test, p = 0.58/p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: This study identified a high incidence of CVD in heterogenous long-term breast cancer survivors, most >10 years post-treatment. Over half had clinical CVD findings warranting follow-up and/or intervention. Each imaging test independently contributed to the detection rate. This provides early evidence that long-term cardiac screening may be of value to a wider group of breast cancer survivors than previously recognized.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Cardiotoxicidade/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Unilaterais da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Unilaterais da Mama/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Antraciclinas/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Cardiotoxicidade/epidemiologia , Cardiotoxicidade/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença das Coronárias/epidemiologia , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Coração/efeitos dos fármacos , Coração/efeitos da radiação , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcificação Vascular/epidemiologia
3.
Radiol Clin North Am ; 59(4): 631-646, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34053610

RESUMO

Renal masses are commonly encountered on cross-sectional imaging examinations performed for nonrenal indications. Although most can be dismissed as benign cysts, a subset will be either indeterminate or suspicious; in many cases, imaging cannot be used to reliably differentiate between benign and malignant masses. On-going research in defining characteristics of common renal masses on advanced imaging shows promise in offering solutions to this issue. A recent update of the Bosniak classification (used to categorize cystic renal masses) was proposed with the goals of decreasing imaging follow-up in likely benign cystic masses, and therefore avoiding unnecessary surgical resection of such masses.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Imagem/métodos , Achados Incidentais , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Humanos , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA